Jeep Wrangler JL 2.0L vs. 3.6L vs. 3.0L
Christian Hazel shares his thoughts on the three current engine choices for the new JL Wrangler.
"What's the best engine for a new Wrangler?" Among my circle of friends who know I'm a Jeep guy, I get that question all the time. With the 2007-2017 Wranglers, that's one question I never had to answer. With the JK series of Jeeps, you had one engine option for a new Wrangler. In the 2007-2011 models it was the 202-hp/237-lb-ft 3.8L and then for the 2012-2017 it was the 285-hp/260-lb-ft 3.6L. There's some conjecture amongst JK shoppers as to which one is preferable, but I'll joke (with a kernel of truth) that anybody who says 3.8L is wrong.
But then along came the JL Wrangler, and after production lines were sorted, we're now currently blessed with three engine choices and a fourth that will shortly be coming. So, back to that question, which is better for a Jeep Wrangler: the 270-hp/290-lb-ft 2.0L eTorque inline four-cylinder, the 285-hp/260-lb-ft 3.6L Penta star V-6, or the 260-hp/480-lb-ft 3.0L EcoDiesel V-6 turbodiesel? (Hey, the V-8 Hemi isn't out on the streets just yet!)

Wrangler with 2.0L Engine: On-Road Drivability
In terms of performance behind the wheel, the 2.0L is my personal choice of engine. It is linear and seamless. The turbo bites into the power delivery way down low, providing a lot of gooey torque that gets you up and off the line in a hurry. There isn't the exhilarating top-end kick that you get from the 3.6L gasser, but from the driver's seat the Jeep feels like a spitball greasily being blown through a straw as it maintains speed on grades without downshifting or accelerates into traffic or for passing without a lot of vibration and fuss. Just put your foot down and enjoy the ride as you squirt forward. For me, the 2.0L blends the best balance between power and drivability while imparting the perception that the vehicle is lighter and airier despite the fact the engine is virtually the same weight as the gas V-6.
Wrangler with 2.0L Engine: Fuel Economy
In real-world driving I've been able to eke mpg numbers in the low 20s on highway drives. As much as 23 mpg at 75-mph freeway speeds in a soft-top Rubicon model is nothing to sneeze at, especially considering the aero was a bit dirtier than it would have been in a lower-slung hard-top Sahara. Around town I averaged a solid 16-18 mpg with a lot of stop and go. That's pretty darn good in my book, considering the in-town mileage on the JL 2.0L Rubicon was as good or better than the highway mileage I was generating in a 2007 3.8L Rubicon. You can run the 2.0L on regular-grade 87-octane fuel, but most of the time, even though I could barely tell any difference, I was filling the tank with the recommended 91-octane for best performance and efficiency.
Wrangler with 2.0L Engine: Off-Road Drivability

