Skinny vs Wide Tires! Versus!
Just How Much Rubber Should Actually Meet the Road?
Tall and skinny versus short and fat. Sounds like a horrible lead-in to some sort of terrible celebrity reality TV fight night series, but anyone who eats, breathes, sleeps, and dreams 4x4 knows just the debate we’re referring to. In bottomless mud you want something that floats along the top, but in mud with a hard bottom you want something skinny that’s going to dig to the hardpack. Even in winter, deep, wet snow is best handled with a wide floatation tire, while contact pressure is key on icy roads, favoring a narrow studded tire. Although 12.5-inch-wide tires are the norm for everything from 33- to 40-inch-tall tires, there are a lot more options out there if you are looking for them. BFGoodrich, Toyo, and Super Swamper all offer pizza cutters if that is your preference, while Mickey Thompson, Super Swamper, and Pit Bull offer wide meats. Not sure which is right for you? Read on, we have an opinion on tires.

Harry Wagner
Freelancer
I like my tires like I like my jeans: skinny. OK, I’m not actually a hipster, but I am writing this story on a portable typewriter at Starbucks. Narrow tires are lighter and easier to package than wide tires since they tuck inside the fenders and don’t swing in as wide of an arc when you are turning the front wheels. I will concede that wider tires offer better floatation in sand and snow, but I spend more time in the rocks and don’t feel that narrow tires are at a disadvantage there. Most of my vehicles are relatively light with underpowered four-cylinder engines, so the lower rotating weight of narrow tires without any loss of ground clearance is a benefit in all environments. On the road I find that narrow tires tend to track better and not follow ruts and grooves on the road nearly as much as wide tires do. Plus, they look right at home on steel wheels under vintage 4x4s.

Verne Simons
Tech Editor
Truth be told, generally when it comes to tires, I don’t have much preference in width. I’ve heard all the arguments for and against both, and since conditions on different trails can vary from obstacle to obstacle, what works and where can change the skinny-versus-fat tire performance argument in a few feet. Tire compound, air pressure, tread design, weight rating, trail conditions, temperature, and a slew of other factors will, in my opinion, make more of a difference in a tire’s function than an inch or less difference in tread width will. If I had to choose, I think I would give a slight nod to a tall skinny tire over a fat short tire. Usually I prefer the way skinny tires look—they are somehow more utilitarian—and if you don’t have to buy new wider wheels to match your new taller tires you save cash. Even when it comes to running a relatively wide flotation tire I tend to head toward a narrower wheel that will keep that tire standing tall and as skinny as possible (and to aid in bead retention and wheel rim protection).

